【P3】2010年6月P3考题预测及分析 —— Mike y>T:fu
P3 Exam question analysis June 2010 ]J\tosTi
General analysis
Bd$i%.r
P3 is not a easy paper at all. It’s mainly about strategic business analysis with which most of accountants are not familiar. It contains many theoretical models, some of them are pretty obscure, difficult to understand and remember. The nodi for the exam do not only lie in theoretical aspect, what’s more, 90%-95% of the real questions require application skills of those theories, they don’t simply test models, and the examiner does not expect an answer mirroring theories, instead discussive answers in an analytical manner demonstrating application skilled are required, in this regard most of Chinese students are weak. W)^0~[
`i
Prior to December 2007, the examiner did not specify the model(s) to be applied leaving some space for students to make a choice among relevant models. At that moment students could benefit from the flexibility in to-be-applied models, if they did not study one model, they have chance to apply another relevant model which they knew. After December 2007, the incumbent examiner tends to stipulate the model or models to be applied, though this method removes the risk of struggling for time-consuming decision about which one should be applied in the exam, other risks do exist if students don’t study the examined theories or they are not familiar with the tested models. In addition, as only one model is requested, students usually have less points to plan their answers rather than previously students could apply 2 or 3 models which can easily build up the volume of answers, and examiner expect deeper analytical answers within the prescribed area. In this regard, deeper answers will be more difficult and more time-consuming as thinking and deduction are inevitable. eC:?j`H-
Another distinctive characteristic of real questions after December 2007 is the volume of reading increased considerably not only in part A but also in part B questions. Before December 2007 the paper was at around 3000 words, now it’s about 3500 – 4000 words, 25% increase in average. On the other hand only 15 minutes were added, representing 8% increase, so higher pressure prevails than before, which necessitate better time planning, higher proficiency of knowledge and more application practice in order to pass P3 successfully. :d7Ju.*J
(Below analysis only refers to history after December 2007 if not specified clearly.) $ qk2!
Part A Strategic position PzThVeJ+
Part A contains following frequently tested topics n!5 :I#B
l PESTEL `~'yy q
l 5 forces model 5\Sm^t|Tx
l Value chain +~lZ]a7k
l SWOT (rV#EA+6[`
l PLC <%fcs"Mb
l Cultural context o@6:|X)7
l Mendelow matrix CO!K[q#
l Strategic lenses ^nn3;
l Porter diamond ~Aul 7[IH
l others p`ai2`qC`
PESTEL is a tool to analyze macro environment and external strategic position, it is an important and frequently tested topic once 3-4 sessions, it was tested in December 2008 (20’) and also appeared on pilot paper (10’), it has good chance to come out this time. #w3cImgp2
Porter’s 5-force model examines micro business environment by analyzing competing forces, it weighs same level as PESTEL, value chain and SWOT do. It has high frequency of being tested about once 2-3 sessions, it was tested in June 2008 (20’) and December 2009 (20’), it also appeared on the pilot paper (15’). As it was just tested in last sitting, so it’s unlikely to be tested again this time. x}I'W?g
Value chain is concerned with analyzing an organization’s primary and supporting activities and identifying the areas where core competences are derived and non core competence or non-value-added activities can be outsourced or eliminated. It’s an important topic same as PESTEL, 5 forces and SWOT. It was tested in December 2009 (25’) and December 2007 (5’+), and appeared on the pilot paper. It normally appears in section B in conjunction with question of reconstructing upstream or downstream value chain (Dec 07) or business process change (Dec 09). Again as it was just tested in last sitting, so it’s unlikely to be tested this time =H&@9=D*
SWOT is a tool to examine both external and internal strategic positions of an organization, it’s an important topic as PESTEL, 5 forces and value chain. It was tested in June 2009 (12’) and December 2007 (20’), if PESTEL does not show up, then SWOT is likely to be tested. {VqcZhqy/l
Product life cycle is another frequently tested topic usually together with other topics. It depicts different stages of product life cycle, discusses characteristics of each stage and identifies appropriate strategy for different stage. It was tested in June 2009 (part of 18’) and June 2008 (part of 20’). In June 2009 it showed up together with leadership styles and in June 2008 with 5-force model. It’s possible that PLC comes out together with SWOT. Yoy}Zdu}h
Cultural context is about internal environment analysis as it places an important role in strategy formulation. It was only tested in December 2008 (20’) so far and 20 marks indicate that it’s an important topic though it was tested once, so students should not risk the area. It’s likely that it will show up together with PESTEL in Part A question. yD6lzuk{X
Mendelow matrix is another tool to look at internal environment, it’s concerned with stakeholder’s interest and power analysis. It was only tested in December 2009 (10’) so far, it’s relatively easy so students should not lose marks here. Again as it was just tested in last sitting, so it’s unlikely to be tested this time. -}nTwx:|5u
Strategic lenses look at how strategies are developed, they were tested in December 2008 (10’) and June 2009, it’s likely to show up in this session as a small question either in part A or part B. R(Y4n w+Y-
Porter Diamond is used to examine the strategic position of an industry within a country as a whole, it also looks at macro environment but focuses on industries instead of organizations. It has not been tested so far but was examined in December 2004. so it’s no longer a popular topic. However, if PESTEL does not show up, then Porter Diamond is possible to be tested. Q%6Lc.i
Other topics include core competence, knowledge management, benchmarking and mission statement which students should master. Particularly deserving notice, there was an technical article about knowledge management in this April magazine. 71i".1l{K
Part B Strategic choices 8w &